|
Article
Morphotypes dentaires actuels et fossiles des Chiroptères Vespertilioninés. 1e partie: Etude des morphologies dentaires
Published online: 30/09/1985
Keywords:
bats; Dental morphology; fossils; PHYLOGENY; recent; Systematics
https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.15.2.71-128
References: 19
Cite this article:
Henri Menu, 1985. Morphotypes dentaires actuels et fossiles des Chiroptères Vespertilioninés. 1e partie: Etude des morphologies dentaires. PalaeoVertebrata 15 (2): 71-128. doi: 10.18563/pv.15.2.71-128
Export citation
Abstract
The classifications of the recent vespertilionine bats were made wihtout taking in account the teeth morphology; this resulted in a reduction of the possibilities of comparison with the available fossils. The generalized use of dental formulae was abusive: this contributed to the admission of artificial genera. These conditions have long delayed the consideration of characters able to frame the phylogeny of the sub-family. In the first part of the study, the teeth morphologies are described and analysed. morphological reference types are established for each upper and lower tooth: they should make an easier elaboration of criteria for the differentiation at generic level. The position of the species in view of these criteria allows one to group them into homogeneous genera, and to appreciate the degree of relationship that the latter have between them. The second part of the study (next publicationà will develop inferences dealing with systematics and phylogeny
Published in Vol. 15, Fasc. 2 (1985)
References
HELLER K.-G. & VOLLETH M., 1984. — Taxonomic position of « Pipistrellus societatis » Hill, 1972 and the karyological characteristics of the genus Eptesicus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Z. zool. Syst. u. Evol., 22 (1): 65-77, 5 fig. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1984.tb00563.x
JEPSEN G.-L., 1966. — Early Eocene Bat from Wyoming. Science, 154 (3754): 1333-1339, 2 fig. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3754.1333
JEPSEN G.-L., 1970. — Bat origins and evolution. In: Biology of bats, Academic Press, New York, London, 1: 1-64, 10 fig.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-758001-2.50006-X
LEGENDRE S., 1984. — Étude odontologique des représentants actuels du groupe Tadarida (Chiroptera, Molossidae). Implications phylogénétiques, systématiques et zoogéographiques. Rev. suisse Zool., 91 (2): 399-442, 18 fig., 1 pl. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.81886
MAYR E., 1942. — Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 364 p.
MENU H. & SIGÉ B., 1971. — Nyctalodontie et myotodontie, importants caractères de grades évolutifs chez les chiropteres entomophages. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 272 D: 1735-1738, 1 pl.
MENU H., 1984. — Révision du statut de Pipistrellus subflavus (F. Cuvier, 1832). Proposition d'un taxon générique nouveau: Perimyotis nov. gen. Mammalia, 48 (3): 409-416, 2 fig. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1984.48.3.409
MILLER G.-S. & ALLEN G.-M., 1928. — The American bats of the genera Myotis and Pizonyx. Smithsonian Inst., Univ. St. Nat. Mus. Bull., 144: 1-218, 1 fig., 13 cartes. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.144.i
REVILLIOD P., 1917. — Fledermäuse aus der Braunkohle von Messel bei Darmstadt. Abhandl. Hess. Geol. Landes zu Darmstadt, 7 (2): 157-201, 18 fig., 1 pl.
RUSSELL D.-E., LOUIS P. & SAVAGE D.-E., 1973. — Chiroptera and Dermoptera of the French Early Eocene. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci., 95: 1-57, 13 fig.
RUSSELL D.-E. & SIGÉ B., 1970. — Révision des chiropteres lutétiens de Messel (Hesse, Allemagne). Palaeovertebrata, 3 (4): 83-182, 29 fig., 6 pl., 5 tabl. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.3.4.83-182
SIGÉ B., 1974. — Données nouvelles sur le genre Stehlinia (Vespertilionoidea, Chiroptera) du Paléogène d'Europe. Palaeovertebrata, 6 (3-4): 253-272, 5 fig. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.6.3-4.253-272
SIGÉ B. & RUSSELL D.-E., 1980. — Compléments sur les chiropteres de l'Éocène moyen d'Europe. Les genres Palaeochiropteryx et Cecilionycteris. Palaeovertebrata, Mém. Jubil. Lavocat: 91-126, 1 fig., 8 pl. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.9.ext.91-126
SIMPSON G.-G., 1943. — Criteria for genera, species and subspecies in Zoology and Paleozoology. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 44: 145-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1943.tb31301.x
SMITH J.-D. & STORCH G., 1981. — New Middle Eocene bats from « Grube Messel » near Darmstadt, W. Germany (Mammalia, Chiroptera). Senckenbergiana biol., 61 (3/4): 153-157, 4 fig., 2 tabl., 2 pl.
SUTTON J.-F. & GENOWAYS H.-H., 1974. — A new vespertilionine bat from Barstovian deposits of Montana. Occasional papers, Mus. Texas Tech. Univ., 20: 1-8, 1 pl. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.156506
TATE G.-H.-H., 1942. — Results of the Archbold expeditions, N° 47. Review of the vespertilionine bats. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 80 (7): 221-297, 5 fig.
VAN VALEN L., 1966. — Deltatheria, a new order of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 132 (1): 1-126, 17 fig., 8 pl.
VAN VALEN L., 1979. — The evolution of bats. Evolutionary Theory, 4: 103-121, 2 fig.
|
PDF
|
